Thinking About Reflective Practice
Reflective
practice is well established in the literature across a range of professions (Finlay,
2008; Galea, 2012; Timmins, Murphy, Howe & Dennehy, 2013; Husebo & O’Regan,
2015; Potter, 2015; Zalipour, 2015) to evaluate outcomes, using evidence, to
challenge held assumptions, formulate alternate hypotheses, and concretise
these hypotheses by putting theory into practice. The purpose of genuine reflection in education is to develop a deeper
understanding of personal learning and professional knowledge with a view to
improving both personal and learner outcomes.
In this way practice informs reflection and reflection informs practice –
Figure 1 (Zalipour, 2015).
Figure 1
If we
assume the willingness to be better practitioners,
then it seems self-evident that we need to become better reflectors (of that practice).
Reflective
practice is a critique
(internally/externally or both) of existing practice, and should not be a criticism of it. To critique
is to give a detailed analysis of something based in evidence. It has as its foundation personal improvement. To criticise
is to point out shortcomings. Criticism
need not be negative, but it’s often judgmental nature means it can devolve
into negativity (often without an evidence base). Therefore, the purpose of reflective practice
as a critique of practice, is performance improvement.
While the
benefits are clear, the fait accompli
manner by which it been “systemised” (Galea, 2012, p.246) in institutions can lead
to, “bland, mechanical, routinized and unthinking ways of doing reflective
practice” (Finlay, 2008, p.10). This
would suggest that we should be actively encouraging reflective practice but
not prescribing any single best way of doing
reflective practice. People need to see
that levels of reflective practice exist along a continuum from lower to higher
levels of emotional engagement, time and resource investment.
Many models
exist for reflective practice (see https://goo.gl/Lesp9d
for an excellent synopsis), no single model stands above others. Potter, (2015, p.338) suggests this is
because reflective practice is a “fuzzy concept” which reflects its complexity. Consequently, the range of models would
suggest individuals engaging in reflective practice find a model that is the “best
fit” for them in terms of personality, personal comfort, empowerment, and time
(Finlay, 2008; Galea, 2012; Husebo and O’Regan, 2015). It could therefore be argued, irrespective of
the reflective practice model chosen, that reflective practice in any form is
better than no reflective practice at all.
I use Gibbs
Reflective Cycle (1998, in Husebo & O’Regan, 2015) – Figure 2. This model seems intuitive and taps into my
process oriented nature. Within Gibbs’ model,
the space exists to be an “assimilator” - in keeping with my personal learning
and reflective style. This means someone
who prefers the evaluation, analysis and conclusion stages to think about what
they are doing and form abstract concepts based in sound evidence to understand
why they are doing what they are doing (McLeod, 2013).
While the
strengths of Gibb’s Reflective cycle are its relative simplicity and step-by-step
process, this also presents its greatest limitation in that it can lead to
superficiality as one moves from step to step in a mechanistic manner. However, as Potter (2015, p.338) notes, this
is linked to the “cognitive opacity” of reflective practice in that the level
of reflective interest or value occurs within
the practitioner and is not directly observable. Hence its value is highly individualistic. Who are we to judge if someone has been
reflective enough? It may be better to
conceptualise the reflective process not as a cycle, but a spiral such that
conclusions and plans for action will stimulate further reflection when applied
– Figure 3.
This way,
one never stops reflecting.
References:
ESR – The GP trainee's survival guide. (2017). Thegptraineessurvivalguide.com.
Retrieved 13 November 2017, from https://thegptraineessurvivalguide.com/category/esr/
Finlay,
L. (2008). Reflecting on “Reflective practice.” Retrieved from https://pdfs.semanticscholar.org/c128/691f2615de873dfe544fcb5dc902fe812675.pdf
Guide to models of reflection – when & why should you
use different ones? (2016). Lifelong Learning with OT. Retrieved 13
November 2017, from https://lifelonglearningwithot.wordpress.com/2016/05/02/different-models-of-reflection-using-them-to-help-me-reflect/
Husebø,
S. E., O’Regan, S., & Nestel, D. (2015). Reflective Practice and Its Role
in Simulation. Clinical Simulation in Nursing, 11(8), 368–375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecns.2015.04.005
Kolb, D. A., Boyatzis, R. E., &
Mainemelis, C. (2001). Experiential Learning Theory: Previous Research and New Directions.
In R. J. Sternberg & L. Zhang (Eds.), Perspectives on thinking,
learning, and cognitive styles. The educational psychology series. (pp.
227–247). Mahwah NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates Inc. Retrieved from http://www.d.umn.edu/~kgilbert/educ5165-731/Readings/experiential-learning-theory.pdf
McLeod, S. (2013). Kolb's
Learning Styles and Experiential Learning Cycle | Simply Psychology.
(2017). Simplypsychology.org. Retrieved 12 November 2017, from https://www.simplypsychology.org/learning-kolb.html
Potter,
C. (2015). Leadership development: an applied comparison of Gibbs’ Reflective
Cycle and Scharmer’s Theory U. Industrial and Commercial Training, 47(6),
336–342. https://doi.org/10.1108/ICT-03-2015-0024
Timmins,
F., Murphy, M., Howe, R., & Dennehy, C. (2013). “I Hate Gibb’s Reflective
Cycle 1998” (Facebook©2009): Registered Nurses’ Experiences of Supporting
Nursing Students’ Reflective Practice in the Context of Student’s Public
Commentary. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 93,
1371–1375. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.10.046
Why Reflect? - Reflection4Learning. (2017). Sites.google.com.
Retrieved 13 November 2017, from https://sites.google.com/site/reflection4learning/why-reflect
Zalipour, A.
(2015). www Reflective Practice. Retrieved from https://www.waikato.ac.nz/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/360861/Reflective-Practice-June-2015.pdf
Nice perspectives Craig. I am leery of tools that want me to say how a "feel" about something. The empiricist in me wants to be dispassionate and clinical. I like the spiral of neverending reflection much better, as it promotes the idea that there are no final solutions.
ReplyDeleteLouis. I agree with you in the sense that I find the "feeling" part challenging. Am I "feeling" right about it? Are "feelings" of value or is their more to be gained from dispassionate reasoning. It is a weakness of mine - according to many models - and that is why I have Tania. As a critical friend in reflection she is better at drawing that out of me than I am myself. I tend to suggest that feelings cloud judgement.
ReplyDeleteTerrible grammar in the Gibbs Reflective Cycle - should be might 'have' not might 'of'. Other than that though, thank you for sharing, I will be looking at the different models to see what fits my practice best.
ReplyDeleteNice article and explanation Keep continuing to write an article like this you may also check my website
ReplyDeleteSmartFTP Enterprise Crack
ByteFence Crack
GOM Player Plus Crack
Avast Premier Crack
T-RackS Brickwall Limiter Crack